Saturday, February 2, 2013

The two most common themes within Lord of the Flies are the battle between civilization and savagery and the loss of innocence. Explain how this...

Those two themes are closely linked together because, as civilization falls apart for the boys, they lose their innocence at the same rate. Already in Chapter 1, the reader can see the threads of civilization already beginning to unwind from each other.  


First, the reader is shown that the only characters through the entire chapter are young boys between the ages of 6 and 12. There are no adults around. Furthermore, the island is completely uninhabited. There is no existing civilization or government structure. To the boys' credit, they do try to establish a form of civilization. They hold an election to nominate a chief, and Ralph is chosen as leader. Unfortunately Jack doesn't agree with the decision, and readers can already see a conflict developing between Ralph and Jack. 


Another piece of evidence for the loss of innocence in Chapter 1 is the trapped pig scene. It's amazing to me that Jack's initial response to the pig is to kill it. Granted, the boys are on an island and food is going to be an issue, but it isn't yet. The boys still believe that rescue is a good possibility. None of them have come to the realization that they might be on the island for quite some time; however, Jack's thoughts are immediately on violence and killing just for the sake of killing. There is no firm, civilized structure in place to curb his bloodthirstiness. Despite Jack's initial enthusiasm, he can't find the nerve to actually kill the pig. He still has some amount of innocence about him. 



They knew very well why he hadn’t: because of the enormity of the knife descending and cutting into living flesh; because of the unbearable blood.



The reader is only briefly comforted by Jack's apparent innocence, because he immediately vows to not hesitate to kill ever again. 



“I was going to,” said Jack. He was ahead of them, and they could not see his face. “I was choosing a place. Next time—! He snatched his knife out of the sheath and slammed it into a tree trunk. Next time there would be no mercy. He looked round fiercely, daring them to contradict.


Why were the western routes of the long drive better than the Sedalia route that was first used?

Cowboys in the American west drove cattle from Texas, where they were raised, to points in Kansas and elsewhere, from which they were shipped via railroads to Chicago for slaughter. There wasn't even beef in the north, and beef commanded a high price. The first cattle drive route, used in 1866, was from Texas to Sedalia, Missouri. However, this route involved going across farmland, and farmers protested the cattle drives, which they thought would destroy their crops and spread diseases to their animals. As a result, some farmers formed groups that threatened cowboys.


The later western routes of the long drives, such as the Chisholm and Western trails, were better because they crossed better grassland. In addition, these trails had to cross fewer Native American areas and farm areas. These later trails reached new railroad spurs such as Abilene and Wichita. No matter which route they followed, cowboys' lives were rough, as they had to steer thousands of cattle to towns hundreds of miles away and battle the elements while doing so. 

Friday, February 1, 2013

In The Merchant Of Venice, who do you think showed the greatest mercy: the duke, Portia, or Antonio? Justify your response.

A remarkably complex question, actually. To judge whom of the three showed Shylock the most mercy, one needs to look at what each demands and how that will affect Shylock. Obviously, the one whose demands bear the slightest adjustment to Shylock's circumstances, should be deemed the most merciful.


Let us peruse the three separately, starting with Portia:



The law hath yet another hold on you.
It is enacted in the laws of Venice,
If it be proved against an alien
That by direct or indirect attempts
He seek the life of any citizen,
The party 'gainst the which he doth contrive
Shall seize one half his goods; the other half
Comes to the privy coffer of the state;
And the offender's life lies in the mercy
Of the duke only, 'gainst all other voice.
In which predicament, I say, thou stand'st;
For it appears, by manifest proceeding,
That indirectly and directly too
Thou hast contrived against the very life
Of the defendant; and thou hast incurr'd
The danger formerly by me rehearsed.
Down therefore and beg mercy of the duke.



It is clear from what she says that Portia has no compassion at all for Shylock. She (in the role of lawyer) had given him numerous opportunities to renege on his demand for a pound of Antonio's flesh, but he stubbornly refused and here she is exercising the prescripts of the law. She is almost brutal in her judgment and wishes to punish Shylock for his stubbornness, lack of sympathy, and the alacrity he displayed to cut a piece of Antonio's flesh when told that he would be acting within his rights.


What Portia states above is that Shylock has committed a capital crime. In wishing to cut a pound of Antonio's flesh, he was being vengeful and spiteful, for such an act would surely have caused Antonio either grievous injury or death. This was against Venetian law and thus, not only would Shylock forfeit his entire estate, which would be divided equally between the state and Antonio, but also his life. She has proven Shylock's guilt and now leaves him at the mercy of the duke, whom Shylock should plead with for his life.


Portia has only been indirectly affected by Shylock's actions. The only reason she chose to present herself at court, in disguise, was to save the life of her beloved's closest friend and confidante. She wanted to spare him the pain and suffering of having lost a dear friend. Her compassion is therefore directed towards Bassanio and Antonio. Clearly, Portia shows Shylock no mercy.


The duke now has to dispense justice and says the following:



That thou shalt see the difference of our spirits,
I pardon thee thy life before thou ask it:
For half thy wealth, it is Antonio's;
The other half comes to the general state,
Which humbleness may drive unto a fine.



He points out a clear contrast between what Shylock wanted (Antonio's life) and what he is about to do. He pardons Shylock his life and commands that he surrender half his wealth to Antonio and the other to the state, as compensation for his vindictive desire to harm Antonio. Truly, the duke has been most merciful, for if he had decided to issue a death sentence, well, Shylock would have been no more. 


Antonio later beseeches the duke and the court to do the following:



... quit the fine for one half of his goods,
I am content; so he will let me have
The other half in use, to render it,
Upon his death, unto the gentleman
That lately stole his daughter:
Two things provided more, that, for this favour,
He presently become a Christian;
The other, that he do record a gift,
Here in the court, of all he dies possess'd,
Unto his son Lorenzo and his daughter.



Antonio requests that the duke cancel the fine for half of Shylock's wealth and states that he does not want the other half. He asks that he should be made trustee of that half to be kept until Shylock's demise when it would then be transferred to Lorenzo, Shylock's newly-acquired son-in-law. He furthermore makes two requests: that Shylock become a Christian and secondly, that he wills all his possessions to Lorenzo and Jessica who will then inherit such upon his death.


Antonio's request seems truly compassionate and merciful, however, there is some malice in his appeal. Asking Shylock, a deeply devout Jew, to become a Christian is quite vindictive. It is a lifelong punishment which Shylock, most probably, would not be able to bear. He would have to adopt Christian values which means that he would be unable to continue his trade - moneylending at interest. This would surely mean his end. One may ask whether Antonio, shrewd man that he is, expects that Shylock may very well take his own life for having suffered this most devastating humiliation.


If one weighs the three against each other, the duke has surely been the most merciful for his judgement has been without malice, unlike that of the other two.

Why does Malcolm lie about himself to Macduff?

The scene between Malcolm and Macduff in Act IV sc iii appears very confusing at first glance until we realize Malcolm is actually testing Macduff’s loyalty to Scotland.  Malcolm tells Macduff that he will be a far worse tyrant than Macbeth will:



“It is myself I mean: in whom I know
All the particulars of vice so grafted
That, when they shall be open'd, black Macbeth
Will seem as pure as snow, and the poor state
Esteem him as a lamb, being compared
With my confineless harms.”



At first Macduff does not believe him, since Macbeth is such an evil, treacherous leader. No one else could possibly be worse.  However, Malcolm claims he is extremely lustful, greedy, and unjust. He would deliberately abuse the powers that come with being king for his own pleasure and gain, completely opposing any action that would be for the good of Scotland. Macduff finally believes him and rebukes him for being such a vile son when King Duncan was such a noble father. He agrees that Malcolm should not govern Scotland, and he weeps because the country he loves has no hope of escaping oppressive tyranny.


At this point Malcolm confesses that everything he said about himself was a lie. He wanted to see how Macduff would react. If Macduff were fine with Malcolm becoming king even though he was as bad (or worse) for Scotland than Macbeth, Malcolm would know that Macduff did not truly love Scotland. Macduff would just be trying to gain advantage by aligning himself with a new tyrant, and therefore could not be trusted.


Macduff passes the test, showing that his love and loyalty are to his country above himself. When Malcolm sees this, he tells Macduff the truth and explains his current plans to dethrone Macbeth. The two become allies.

Thursday, January 31, 2013

In To Kill a Mockingbird, what was the role of fear in the novel?

In To Kill a Mockingbird, fear is a central theme especially in the way Harper Lee shows race relations in the town of Maycomb.  The white society of Maycomb are holding onto old values of superiority and privilege that they are afraid will be undermined by members of the black community.  Because whites have been in power for so long, they are anxious to keep it that way.  The discriminatory practices and blatant racism seen throughout the novel show the fear embedded in their psyches.  Whites in Maycomb do not want to give up the privileges afforded them simply because they are white.  For example, despite Bob Ewell’s status as the lowest example of “white trash”, he and his daughter, Mayella, are still awarded privilege in the courtroom when the jury decides to believe a white man and woman over a black man’s testimony.  There was never a question in the mind of Atticus or the jury if the decision would go for or against Tom Robinson.  Racism and privilege dictated the verdict.


Blacks in the community of Maycomb are also fearful of the racism that exists.  It affects their daily lives where they live, where they work, and how they are treated.  The attempts of the lynch mob to hang Tom Robinson are an example of the unjust treatment blacks received.  Tom Robinson’s “escape attempt” shows the fear he has to go to prison and leave his family unable to survive without him.   During this Jim Crow era of the South, blacks were not given many rights, and they understood that if they didn’t adapt to the social codes of the whites, they would be in grave danger.


Fear is a major theme because of the dynamics of race relations in Maycomb during this time.

What reasons did Senator Borah provide as to why the United States should refuse to join the League of Nations?

Senator Borah earned the nickname “the Great Opposer” because he was against many ideas. One of the things he opposed was the ratification of the Treaty of Versailles that would have had the United States join the League of Nations. Senator Borah was concerned that joining the League of Nations would be similar to joining an alliance. There was a provision in the charter of the League of Nations that would have required member nations to commit to actions recommended by the League of Nations. Senator Borah believed this would have impacted American foreign policy negatively. It could require the United States to take an action that wasn’t in our best interests or to take an action about something that had no effect or interest to us. Senator Borah felt it was better for the United States to deal with our own issues instead of getting involved in situations that had little or no effect on us. Thus, Senator Borah opposed the Versailles Treaty and the United States joining the League of Nations.

Tuesday, January 29, 2013

How does Benedick's soliloquy show what kind of person he is in Much Ado About Nothing?

Benedick makes a very sexist speech, but he is not really as bad as he seems. He is just in love.


Benedick is in love with Beatrice (and she with him), but neither will admit it. He likes to play tough, making comments about how marriage is terrible and not for him.



That a woman conceived me, I thank her; that she
brought me up, I likewise give her most humble
thanks: but that I will have a recheat winded in my
forehead, or hang my bugle in an invisible baldrick,
all women shall pardon me. (Act 1, Scene 1)



Benedick sees Claudio, in love with Hero. He wants to disparage Claudio and the whole enterprise of pairing up. After all, according to Benedick, being in love just makes a man grumpy and all lovers are fools.



I do much wonder that one man, seeing how much
another man is a fool when he dedicates his
behaviors to love, will, after he hath laughed at
such shallow follies in others, become the argument
of his own scorn by failing in love: and such a man
is Claudio. (Act 2, Scene 3)



Benedick swears that he will not be a fool, and makes a silly list of the traits of his ideal woman. She needs to be rich, wise, and virtuous. She also has to be a conversationalist and play a musical instrument. He creates a perfect, unattainable woman.


It is easy to dismiss Benedick as a pig. However, his words are just a cover how he really feels. Benedick is not exactly a playboy. He has been hurt. He was in love with Beatrice before, but she, like him, has sworn off of love. Both of them are playing tough to cover for the fact that they are really interested in each other.


However, when Benedick is tricked into revealing his true feelings, it is different. Benedick thinks that Beatrice loves him, and he begins to express his real view of love. He may play a shallow playboy, but in reality Benedick wants the same things we all want. He wants someone to be with.

What was the device called which Faber had given Montag in order to communicate with him?

In Part Two "The Sieve and the Sand" of the novel Fahrenheit 451, Montag travels to Faber's house trying to find meaning in th...