Compare and contrast classical management theory vs. human relations management theory

Classical management theory and human relations management theory are similar in that both view incentives as a strong motivator towards better performance. The difference between the two is the type of incentives offered. In Classical management, better wages and salaries are expected to translate to better performance. On the other hand, human relations viewed administration interaction and improved communication with the workers as a better incentive.

Classical management and human relations management theory are similar in that they both sought to increase productivity. They, however, differ in the way improved productivity should be achieved. Classical management suggested that a standard method of performing the duties required would increase worker efficiency and translate to improved productivity. On the other hand, human relations suggested that collaboration and teamwork would increase productivity by meeting the workers’ social needs.

Classical management differs from human relation because it views the workers as machines or as part of an assembly line. Human relations views workers as human beings with social needs that need to be satisfied for the well-being of the working institution.