The Prince of Morocco has two objections to the lead casket when it comes time for him to make his choice in Act 2. The lead casket’s inscription says that anyone who chooses it “must give and hazard all he hath”, and Morocco immediately decides that the risk is not worth it: “Must give – for what? For lead? Hazard for lead?” Like many characters in the play, Morocco is used to sizing up investment risks, and this looks like a bad deal. He also doubts that a prize as valuable as Portia could be contained in a worthless metal box – he puts a lot of value on appearances (he even immediately makes apologies for his skin color on his first entrance, a telling moment in a play obsessed with race and pedigree) and believes that appearances offer reliable clues about worth. The casket puzzle is designed to weed out exactly that kind of appearance-based, investment-obsessed thinking, and it weeds out Morocco very quickly.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
What was the device called which Faber had given Montag in order to communicate with him?
In Part Two "The Sieve and the Sand" of the novel Fahrenheit 451, Montag travels to Faber's house trying to find meaning in th...
-
The coat in Arms and the Man by George Bernard Shaw serves as a plot device. It gives Captain Bluntschli an excuse to revisit Raina to ret...
-
Here are 10 words you could use to describe Peeta from Suzanne Collins' The Hunger Games: 1) Kind - Peeta is a gentleman; when he and ...
-
The amount of heat lost by brass cylinder is transferred to paraffin. The amount of heat loss by the brass cylinder is given as = mass x hea...
No comments:
Post a Comment