Sunday, January 31, 2016

What three mistakes does Scout make during her first day at school?

The first mistake Scout makes during her first day of school is reading aloud in Miss Caroline's class. Miss Caroline is a young, new teacher in Maycomb County who subscribes to a rigid form of education. She tells Scout to stop reading with her father. Scout tries to defend Atticus by telling her that nobody "taught" her how to read. Scout maintains that she was born knowing how to read because that's what Jem told her.


The second mistake Scout makes during her first day of school is writing a letter to Dill Harris in the middle of a class activity. Scout is bored, and Miss Caroline catches her writing the letter. Miss Caroline reprimands her and tells Scout that they print in first-grade because students don't learn to write until they're in third-grade.


The third mistake Scout makes is attempting to explain Walter Cunningham's family background. When Walter refuses to take the quarter from Miss Caroline for lunch, Scout steps in and tries to explain his situation. She tells her teacher that Walter's family is poor and they refuse to take anything they cannot return. Scout says, "You're shamin' him Miss Caroline," and her teacher gets offended. (Lee 28) Miss Caroline tells Scout she is off to a bad start and gives her a dozen little pats on the palm as a punishment.

Why did the thieves and beggars drink to the English law?

In Chapter 17, Prince Edward has been lured into John Canty's clutches again. We are told in this chapter that Canty now calls himself John Hobbs. Meanwhile, the death of King Henry VIII, Edward's father, has been a great blow to Edward; the young prince now finds himself bereft of a father and is a prisoner to boot. Grieved beyond measure, he retires to the far end of the barn that he has been lured into and proceeds to brood. Eventually, he falls asleep.


He is soon rudely awakened by loud noises:



A bright fire was burning in the middle of the floor, at the other end of the barn; and around it, and lit weirdly up by the red glare, lolled and sprawled the motliest company of tattered gutter-scum and ruffians, of both sexes, he had ever read or dreamed of.  There were huge stalwart men, brown with exposure, long-haired, and clothed in fantastic rags; there were middle-sized youths, of truculent countenance, and similarly clad; there were blind mendicants, with patched or bandaged eyes; crippled ones, with wooden legs and crutches; diseased ones, with running sores peeping from ineffectual wrappings...



These are the thieves and beggars you mention above; they form part of an underground group of thieves that John Hobbs belongs to. They drink and talk raucously in the barn. Soon, a thief named Yokel, who was once a prosperous farmer, tells of his sad fate living under English law. Accordingly, his mother was a healer who was burned as a witch after one of her patients died. After his mother's death (she appeared to be the main breadwinner of the household), the farmer found himself and his little family begging for food.


Yokel relates that his family members were unmercifully lashed "through three towns" because it was a crime to beg in England. Undeterred, Yokel had continued begging for food for his children. Meanwhile, his wife died from the injuries caused by the lashes, and his children starved to death. Yokel himself was sent to the stocks and both his ears were cut off as punishment. Eventually, he was sold as a slave but has since run away from his owner. He asserts pitifully that he will be hung, courtesy of the 'wonderful' English law, when he is found.


So, when Yokel encourages his fellow thieves and beggars to drink to the English law, he is actually mocking and criticizing the oppressive character of the law. His sarcasm, in tandem with his sad story, serves to illuminate the true, cruel nature of English law. At his story, Prince Edward is so incensed that he shouts out that he will do away with the kind of law that will hang a poor man for running away from slavery. The thieves and beggars in turn mock Edward for his proud announcement; they don't really believe he is the son of Henry VIII. The chapter ends with Edward feeling very sorry that he ever tried to extend kindness to this rabble group of subjects.

Saturday, January 30, 2016

What is an example of hyperbole in Act 1, scene 3 of Romeo and Juliet?


I’ll lay fourteen of my teeth –


And yet, to my teen be it spoken, I have but four –


She’s not fourteen.



The Nurse uses hyperbolic expression to make a joke at her own expense in Act 1, scene 3 of Romeo and Juliet. She and Lady Capulet are discussing Juliet’s age, and the Nurse, having raised Juliet almost from birth, knows her age better than anyone. First she claims that she will bet her own teeth on Juliet being under 14 – a bet that no one expects her to make in seriousness, after all (she’s really going to have teeth pulled if she is somehow wrong?) and then bemoans the fact that she can’t bet fourteen teeth because she only has four. It’s hyperbole because no one is expected to think that the Nurse truly has only four teeth – in fact, unless there’s a great deal of makeup involved, the audience will be able to plainly see that she has more teeth than that – but tooth loss was very common in old age at the time, and so the nurse is actually making a self-deprecating joke about her age: so old she only has four teeth left. It’s typical of the Nurse’s breezy, jokey attitude in the first part of the play, an attitude that gets increasingly grim and serious as the play progresses toward its tragic end.

It's 1:00 p.m. and cool and humid. The temperature is 60° but really sticky. What evidence can you use to predict where people with this weather...

Based on the evidence given in the question, it's nearly impossible to narrow a location down.  A key piece of information that is not given is the time of year.  The question states that the time is 1:00 in the afternoon.  That is typically the time of day that coincides with the highest temperatures.  But not knowing if it is summer or winter is a big problem.  If it is summer, I would not be guessing places in the southeast United States like previous answers have suggested.  Those places are good guesses only if it is winter, because the temperature is too low for a typical summer afternoon.


That is unless the location is fairly far north or south of the equator during the summer.  For example, right now it is just about noon in Augusta, Maine.  It's June 2, 2016, and the temperature there is 57 degrees with 97% humidity.  The temperature is within a few degrees of your question, and 97% humidity would make the air feel sticky.  


The best information given in the question is the fact that the air feels "sticky."  This means that the relative humidity is quite high.  Relative humidity is the amount of water vapor the air is holding compared to the maximum amount it could hold at a given temperature.  The lower the temperature, the less overall moisture the air can hold.  As temperature drops, relative humidity will rise. The high humidity that the question hints at leads me to think that a possible location has to be near a large body of water. That could be just about any country or state that borders an ocean.  Hawaii, Maine, Washington, England, etc. could all have that temperature and humidity at 1:00 depending on the time of year. Of course places like Michigan in the spring or fall would work well too, because that state is almost completely surrounded by large lakes.  I've linked a couple of U.S. maps that show relative humidity numbers over general regions.  The time of day and month is shown on both maps.  

What were the differences between Anti-Federalists and Federalists?

The main differences between the Anti-Federalists and the Federalists really boiled down to one philosophical issue. Essentially, the Anti-Federalists feared that the powers granted to the federal government under the new Constitution were too extensive. Most believed that these powers could be most safely held by the states, and that granting them to the federal government represented a threat to basic liberties. They argued for changes that went along a broad spectrum. Some thought the best way to restrain these powers was by adding a Bill of Rights, and they refused to support ratification without a promise that a Bill of Rights would be added. Others argued for structural changes to the Constitution itself, such as eliminating Congress's power to set the time and place of federal elections. Still others (though a minority) argued for outright rejection of the document and for a new convention to amend the Articles of Confederation along more agreeable lines. The Anti-Federalists objected to the Constitution on many grounds, but fears of centralized power lay at the heart of most of their complaints.

Friday, January 29, 2016

What is Harper Lee's message/theme on race?

In the novel, Lee shows that racism is born of prejudice, intolerance, and ignorance. There are elements of racism in Maycomb that are quite obvious. The white and black populations live in separate areas. This has to do with economics as much as race. In addition, there are elements of racism that are unsaid and simply understood. When Tom is charged with rape, everyone (black and white) knows that he will have a hard time getting a fair trial from an all-white jury. That is, even the members of the jury silently acknowledge their own prejudices. Atticus presents a logical and strategic case but the jury can not, or will not, overcome their prejudices. In Chapter 23, Atticus notes, "The one place where a man ought to get a square deal is in a courtroom, be he any color of the rainbow, but people have a way of carrying their resentments right into a jury box." 


Some members of Maycomb will admit their prejudices. Some will not admit a thing, even though they perpetuate racist thinking. And, there are some hypocrites who claim that they have no racist thoughts but they clearly still hold some prejudices. Consider Mrs. Merriweather's hypocrisy in supporting the Mrunas but ignoring the needs of the black community in her own town. 


In Chapter 23 (same section), Atticus adds, " As you grow older, you’ll see white men cheat black men every day of your life, but let me tell you something and don’t you forget it— whenever a white man does that to a black man, no matter who he is, how rich he is, or how fine a family he comes from, that white man is trash.” Atticus is saying that, because of racism and intolerance, black men (and women) are at a disadvantage. They do not get the same rights and opportunities and understanding that whites in this society would get. So, when a white citizen takes advantage of this, Atticus says this is trashy. In this sense, racism is more than just having evil thoughts. Racism manifests in real ways and affects real lives. Tom is accused and killed because of racism. 

Thursday, January 28, 2016

I'm filling out an internship application, but it asks me why I should be chosen to become a Leader in their team (its a leadership internship),...

You are on the right track on your application in terms of thinking of specific examples. However, you might want to consider the larger picture.


What qualities of leadership do you have? Your extracurricular activities and jobs can be used described as assets if you think of your experience with them in leadership terms. For example, you might be able to say, "I'm a team player." "I learned about the importance of working together as a team in band, cheer, and on the basketball court." Then, you could give examples. This may or may not be true of you, but I am giving you an example of a leadership trait to help you think in terms of your strengths. 


One could think of many leadership traits learned in sports such as: strategy, hard work/grit, knowing the importance of preparation. This may help you think more deeply about your work. Ultimately, it's a personal answer. Remember these tips:


1) You want to describe what qualities you have that might make you stand out from the crowd. You always want to back up these assertions with examples. 


2) You want to talk about how your leadership qualities relate to the particular program to which you are applying.


Good luck on your application. 

What element has 3 energy levels/orbitals and 5 valence electrons in its outer energy level?

The element that has three energy levels and five valence electrons in its outer level is phophorous, atomic number 15. Each row or period of the periodic table corresponds to a principal energy level. All elements in the third period have three electron energy levels and have their valence electrons in the third level. Orbitals are sub-levels within the principal energy level, so the word orbital isn't used interchangeably with energy level. 


The number of valence electrons increases by one with each element in a period. Group 1 elements have one valence election, Group 2 elements have two, Group 13 (also known as IIIA) have three, Group 14 (IVA) have four, Group 15 (VA) have five and so on. Phosphorous is the 5th element from the left in the third period so it has five valence electrons.

Wednesday, January 27, 2016

In Romeo and Juliet, what quote best proves that Friar Lawrence came up with the plan to fake Juliet's death?

While my earlier answer details the entire plan, your question asked for one specific quote.  If I were to choose only one, it would be lines 96-101 in Act 4, Scene 1:



Take thou this vial, being then in bed,                                            And this distillèd liquor drink thou off,                                           When presently through all thy veins shall run                                    A cold and drowsy humor, for no pulse                                             Shall keep his native progress, but surcease.                                No warmth, no breath shall testify thou livest.



Here, the Friar lays out the plan that Juliet will drink a concoction that will make her appear dead.  This portion of text later goes on to say that she will awaken two days later fully functional and within the tomb of her family.  At that point, she will be able to escape with Romeo without the knowledge of her family.

What do King, Peaches and Johnny think are the best ways to illegally acquire money?

In Walter Dean Myers' novel Monster, James King is one of the thugs who planned and executed the convenience store robbery with Steve Harmon, the novel's protagonist. As a young kid in a bad neighborhood, Steve used to look up to King as an older and tougher mentor—which is probably why King was able to convince him to participate in the robbery. In this early scene, readers see King, along with Steve and other Harlem residents Johnny and Peaches, talking about how hard life can be and what they can do to make things easier.

Peaches suggests robbing a bank to get some money, but Johnny disagrees, saying, "Bank money is too serious. The man comes down hard for bank money." He continues with a new suggestion, "You need to find a getover where nobody don't care—you know what I mean. You cop from somebody with a green card or an illegal and they don't even report it" (pg. 51).


Johnny is making the argument that the best ways to get money are by taking it from people that the police and society as a whole don't care too much about protecting. The example he gives is robbing undocumented immigrants, who will be too scared of deportation to report the theft to the police.


Peaches goes on to suggest restaurant owners as good people to rob and then notes that restaurants, drugstores, and liquor stores are pretty much the only businesses left in their neighborhood.

In this scene we see the seed planted in King's mind for the drugstore hold-up that gets Steve arrested and put on trial—the primary conflict of the novel. We also get some insight into the personalities and ethics of the people Steve hung out with before the robbery. They are tough and hard, fully committed to their own needs and wants and unwilling to consider how their actions might hurt other people.

Was Brutus a hero for assassinating Julius Caesar?

The nature of Brutus as either a hero or villain is open to differing opinions and this is based on the man’s character and his actions. Those who viewed Caesar as a hero would definitely view his killer as the villain, while on the other hand, those who recognized his outstanding character would consider him a hero. In my opinion, I consider Brutus a hero, not because he participated in the assassination of Caesar, but more so because of his reasons to take part in the murder.


Caesar was an ambitious leader and prior to his death he was making plans to establish himself as an emperor/ dictator. According to Brutus, his friend was turning against the republic and was soon going to become a tyrant who would restrict individual rights and freedoms. The other assassins were fueled by jealousy but Brutus was more concerned about the republic and the threat posed by his friend. In this regard, and for his actions to end Caesar’s life, Brutus would be considered a hero. Despite harboring intentions of becoming a dictator, Caesar had the overwhelming support of the people and according to Brutus, to save the republic his death was inevitable. Mark Antony recognized Brutus’s reasons and character as seen when he stated,



This was the noblest Roman of them all.


All the conspirators save only he


Did that they did in envy of great Caesar.


He only in a general honest thought


And common good to all made one of them.


His life was gentle, and the elements


So mixed in him that nature might stand up


And say to all the world "This was a man."


Tuesday, January 26, 2016

In the short story The Necklace, how does mme. Loisel's approach to having to pay back the money used to purchase another necklace differ from her...

Mathilde Loisel's actions greatly differ from the beginning to the end of the story.


In the beginning, she complains about living in poverty, even though she has a beautiful home, food on her table, and a servant. She leads a relaxed lifestyle, and never has to cook or clean. She feels she has married beneath her and blames her artist parents for this.


After they buy the necklace, her life has changed dramatically. They are forced to give up their home and get a small place. She has to do her own laundry, cooking and cleaning, and this ages her. When she runs into her friend, she looks so much older that her friend doesn't even recognize her, possibly mistaking her for a homeless person. Age and poverty have taken their toll on her. She even has to work for other people at times, and has to bargain with people at the market over every penny.


And this is just her changes. Her husband is forced to do work harder and take out ridiculous loans just to replace the necklace she lost.


For more information check out the link.

I am doing archetypes in literature but am stuck on "underdog." Can someone please provide an example thanks.

The underdog archetype describes the person who nobody expects to win. This person is at a disadvantage for one reason or another. One classic example of an underdog is David in the Biblical match up between David and Goliath. Who would have expected David, an ordinary shepherd armed only with a slingshot, to win a fight against the fearsome giant Goliath? Yet David did win. A fictional female underdog is Cinderella. Nobody would have expected a young woman who had been kept down the way she was by her evil stepmother and stepsisters to earn the hand of a prince. Yet she did, and variations of the Cinderella story appear across many cultures. The underdog archetype teaches us that simple people can offer great gifts and that we shouldn't judge people only by appearances. 

Monday, January 25, 2016

In Chapter 9 of Harper Lee's To Kill a Mockingbird, in what way does the following statement made by Atticus show he believes in destiny:...

In Chapter 9 of Harper Lee's To Kill a Mockingbird, Scout confronts her father because she feels she has been insulted at school due to a case he has taken. Specifically, Scout feels she has been insulted by Cecil Jacobs who demanded to know why her father defends "niggers." Feeling confused because she thinks, based on Cecil's comment, that defending "niggers" is a bad thing, she confronts her father. Atticus makes the following statement as part of his response to explain why he decided to take Tom Robinson's case:



[E]very lawyer gets at least one case in his lifetime that affects him personally.



The above statement shows a great deal about Atticus's characterization.

The term destiny can be defined as the belief that an event in a person's life is inevitable and determined by a power, like God, external to the person. In the above statement, Atticus is claiming that all lawyers, regardless of who they are or where they are, get a case that deeply affects who they are as people. If Atticus believes that all lawyers get such a case, then he believes that the lives of lawyers are guided by something external to the lawyers and that their profession makes it inevitable for them to get such a case. To believe in inevitability is to believe in destiny. Therefore, Atticus is claiming he believes it is the destiny of all lawyers to get a case that deeply affects them, which shows us his belief in destiny.

How could Jerome's novel Three Men in a Boat be seen as a modern travelogue?

Traditionally, older-style travel narratives take us on historical trips of discovery and exploration. For example, we can still go to the remote Galapagos Islands with Charles Darwin through the pages of The Voyage of the Beagle (1839). We can get close to his ground-breaking studies of the finches and the tortoises. Most of us will never get a chance to go to the islands ourselves. So we can read about what it was like to be among the few first explorers of the area and to witness its raw nature, back in the 1830s.


Three Men in a Boat is hardly in the same category. First of all, the story is fiction. Jerome K. Jerome indeed went on Thames trips with his real-life friends George Wingrave (aka George) and Carl Hentschel (aka William Samuel Harris). But he merged and fictionalized some of them into the sequence of events we read here. He invented the dog, Montmorency. And this group was not going where no man had gone before. Taking such boat trips along the course of England’s most important river had come into fashion in the 1870s. By the time this book was released in 1889, it was a fad. According to the web site of the Jerome K. Jerome Society:



Boating on the Thames became the latest craze: in 1888, the year in which Jerome wrote Three Men in a Boat, there were 8,000 registered boats on the river; by the following year there were 12,000. Jerome was therefore writing about the “in thing” – the book doubtless swelled the number of boating fans – though the three friends had caught the bug earlier than most.



Additionally, this is a trip that can still be done by nearly anyone today. It is said that many of the same pubs and inns mentioned in the text are still in operation. In summary: this modern travelogue is a work of creative writing and fiction; it travels along relatively familiar and easy-to-reach territory; and it can be replicated. It can inspire new readers to one day make the trip in person themselves.

Sunday, January 24, 2016

In Coelho's The Alchemist, Santiago's first dream is to travel. How does he accomplish this?

It is interesting how Santiago finds his way to travel. First, his father wants him to be a priest and go to a seminary. The desire to travel is great with Santiago, but he doesn't have money; therefore, he becomes a shepherd. He figures that shepherds make an honorable living and they get to travel around with their flock. This is great for someone who does not want to feel trapped behind a desk or locked inside a cold building every day. But the sheep have their limitations. For example, sheep do travel around the countryside, but they do not go abroad. Santiago's first chosen career only helped him to travel around his own country. 


When he meets the King of Salem, however, he is taught how to fulfill his personal legend--that is, by following omens and listening to one's heart. It is only after Santiago commits himself to following his Personal Legend that he travels. The first omen he must recognize and follow is the dream that shows him he will find his treasure at the Egyptian pyramids. Once Melchizedek points him in the right direction, Santiago travels from Spain to Tarifa, Tanger, across the African desert, to Faiyum (the oasis), and eventually to Egypt. The best explanation of his travels and how he found his way is in the epilogue, which says the following:



"He thought of the many roads he had traveled, and of the strange way God had chosen to show him his treasure. If he hadn't believed in the significance of recurrent dreams, he would not have met the Gypsy woman, the king, the thief, or. . . 'Well, it's a long list. But the path was written in the omens, and there was no way I could go wrong,' he said to himself" (165).


Why does Piggy believe that Ralph must regain control?

In Chapter 5, Ralph leads an assembly where he discusses the true identity of the beast. Jack believes that a beast does not exist because he's traveled everywhere on the island and hasn't seen it. Piggy agrees that there is no beast on the island, but believes that the boys should examine the issue pragmatically. A littlun named Percival claims that he's seen a beast come out of the sea at night. Then, Simon attempts to tell the boys the true nature of the beast, but cannot articulate his thoughts. When it is suggested that Simon is trying to describe a ghost, Piggy grabs the conch and begins to protest. Jack steps in and insults Piggy. Ralph raises the conch to hold a vote on whether or not there are ghosts on the island, and the boys are silent. He feels the power of the conch weakening when the boys do not respond by voting. Jack begins to challenge Ralph's authority and says,



"Bollocks to the rules! We're strong---we hunt! If there's a beast, we'll hunt it down! We'll close in and beat and beat and beat---!" (Golding 91)



Jack leads his group of hunters away and dismisses Ralph and the assembly.


Ralph does not blow the conch and assert his authority after the boys follow Jack. He feels that if he were to blow the conch and have the boys disobey, then they would be complete animals on the island. Ralph then says that he wants to give up being chief. Piggy encourages Ralph to regain authority. Piggy wants Ralph to be chief because he knows that Ralph is his only protection from Jack and the group of hunters. Without civility and rules, the physically weaker members of society, like Piggy and Simon, will suffer.

Saturday, January 23, 2016

Compare and contrast the Shawnee Rebellion in the United States and the Caste War in Mexico. How did they reflect tensions between Native Americans...

In order to adequately answer this question, we should discuss the background of both wars. Tecumseh's War was part of a larger conflict that historians call the Sixty Year's War (1754-1814) and can be considered the last battle of this larger struggle. It featured an Indian confederation led by Tecumseh against the United States Army and Benjamin Harrison. The war was fought over the Indiana Territory and the end saw the territorial dominance of the United States over the Great Lakes region.


The Caste War was fought in the Yucatan territory of Mexico. It initially was fought between the Maya and the Yucatecos, the Spanish-born upper class. The conflict appeared to be over as Mexico joined the side of the Yucatecos in 1848. This end did not materialize, however, as Britain recognized Maya claims in 1855. The British and their colony in Honduras had an economic stake in supporting the Maya and supplied them with ammunition and other supplies. The British changed sides at the beginning of the Twentieth Century as their relationship with Mexico improved. This tipped the balance of power in favor of Mexico as the Maya were not able to receive material support from Honduras.


There were many similarities that existed between the native conflicts in the United States and Mexico. They both reflected desperate attempts to stop the incursion of European powers on their lands. Both conflicts saw the British initially support the indigenous populations, only to change course at a later time. The frustration of the Indians is obvious in that they were continually losing their lands at the whim of the United States or the Spaniards in Mexico. As Native Americans did their best to resist the loss of their lands, they were, more often than not, outgunned and outmanned. Both conflicts were economically driven, as the American government looked to expand west to acquire more resources and land for a growing population. In Mexico, the Maya were losing lands to wealthy planters that were becoming wealthy through sugar and agave cultivation.


A significant difference between the two conflicts is the nature of the role of the Indians. In the Caste War, the Maya were part of a feudal-type economic system that exploited their labor and abused them as workers. They were essentially part of the economic structure of Yucatan and rebelled against the planters. In the United States, the Native Americans were their own sovereign political entity. They formed an alliance of sovereign nations to stop the incursion of the United States on their territories. Both conflicts ended in failure for the indigenous populations and led to further European dominance in the Americas.

In the short story, "The Most Dangerous Game," how does the resolution contribute to the overall meaning of the story?

The resolution of the story comes when Rainsford presumably kills General Zaroff. This is likely what happened, because Rainsford sleeps in Zaroff's bed. 


This ending perfectly fits the story. In fact, this ending confirms what Rainsford said from the beginning of the story, that there are only two classes in the the world - the hunter and the huntee.



"Nonsense," laughed Rainsford. "This hot weather is making you soft, Whitney. Be a realist. The world is made up of two classes--the hunters and the huntees. 



When Rainsford had to face general Zaroff, Rainsford was put in the position of the hunted.  When Rainsford had a change of plan and decided that the only way he would survive this "game," he became the hunter.  Therefore, Rainsford was right unwittingly when he said that all people fall into either the category of the hunter or huntee.  From this perceptive, the ending of the story corroborates the beginning of the story.  These ideas form a literary inclusio. 

Friday, January 22, 2016

On a rough horizontal surface a body of mass 2 kg is given a velocity of 10 m/s. If the coefficient of friction is 0.2 and `g=10 m/s^2,` the body...

Hello!


Denote the mass of a body as `m` and the coefficient of (kinetic) friction as `mu.`


There are three forces acting on this body: the gravitational force `mg` downwards, the reaction force `N` upwards and the friction force `F_f` which acts at a direction opposite to the movement.


The movement is horizontal, therefore vertical forces are balanced, `N=mg.` Also it is known that `F_f=mu N=mu mg.` By Newton's Second law the magnitude of the acceleration a is `F/m=mu g.`


Denote the initial speed as `V_0.` The acceleration `a` has the opposite direction. For a body moving with a constant acceleration the speed `V=V_0-at` and the displacement `D=V_0t-(at^2)/2.`


A body stops when `V=0,` i.e. at `t=V_0/a,` and the displacement is


`V_0^2/a-V_0^2/(2a)=V_0^2/(2a)=V_0^2/(2mu g).`


In numbers, the distance will be `10^2/(2*0.2*10)` =25 (m). This is the answer.

What are three similes from the first three chapters of Lyddie?

A simile is a type of figurative language that uses a direct comparison.  You say that something is like something else.  Similes usually have the words “like” or “as” used to compare two normally unlike things.  They can be used to describe settings or characterize.


A good example of a simile is in the description of the bear.  When Lyddie, her mother, and her siblings are home, a bear wanders into their cabin.  The bear is hungry and repeatedly searches for some kind of food.  He finds some oatmeal cooking on the fire.



He thrust his head deep into the kettle and howled with pain as his nose met the boiling porridge. He threw back his head, but in doing so jerked the kettle off the hook, and when he turned, he was wearing it over his head like a black pumpkin. (Ch. 1)



The comparison here is between the kettle and a pumpkin.  I am not sure how often people wear pumpkins on their heads, but apparently to Lyddie the bear with the kettle on his head resembles a person wearing a black pumpkin on his head.


The next simile is actually from a Bible verse.  In this one, Lyddie’s mother compares the bear to the devil by quoting a verse comparing the devil to a lion.



'Your adversary the devil prowls around like a roaring lion, seeking whom he may devour.” (Ch. 1)



Lyddie points out that the bear was just a bear, but her mother takes it as a sign.  Ever since Lyddie’s youngest sister was born and her father left to go out west to find his fortune, Lyddie’s mother has not been right.  She uses the bear as an excuse to leave the farm and go stay with her sister, Aunt Clarissa.


Lyddie likes similes.  When she goes to sell her calf to her Quaker neighbor, she is impressed by how much better off they seem to be than her family.



Envy crept up like a noxious vine. Lyddie snapped it off, but the roots were deep and beyond her reach. (Ch. 2)



Lyddie compares the envy she feels to a vine because it seems to grow as she looks around the farm and sees how prosperous the Stevens family has been while her family has suffered.  Lyddie does not want to give up her farm, but at this point she has nothing left.  She has been sold off to work at the tavern.


One of the best similes is the description of the tavern the first time Lyddie sees it.



Addition after addition, porch, shed, and a couple of barns, the end one at least four stories high. The whole complex, recently painted with a mix of red ochre and buttermilk, stood against the sky like a row of giant beets popped clear of the earth. (Ch. 3)



Lyddie compares the bright, freshly painted red buildings to new beets.  This demonstrates how impressed she is with the place, but also how intimidating it is.  It symbolizes her desire to remain on the farm rather than work at the tavern, where she feels she is being enslaved.

Thursday, January 21, 2016

What happened during the First Crusade?

The first crusade began in 1095 with a request from the Byzantine Emperor Alexios I Komnenon to Pope Urban II for military assistance in keeping the invading Turks from seizing additional Christian lands. In response Urban II called for a crusade, proclaiming that killing of enemies of Christianity was not a sin, and was in fact a holy deed. The response to this decree was enormous, and the crusaders moved towards the Holy Land in three distinct waves, with a purpose not so much to defend Byzantium but instead to recapture the Holy Land of the Levant.


The first wave arrived at Constantinople in 1096. It was a largely disorganized and poorly equipped rabble of peasantry under the leadership of a man known as Peter the Hermit. This force had no obedience to Alexios I, and in fact the Byzantine Emperor quickly came to view them as a threat. This so-called People's Crusade could not be effectively controlled, and indeed on the way to Constantinople Peter's forces repeatedly went against his orders and slaughtered many Jews in central Europe, viewing them as additional enemies of Christ. With the assistance of Alexios I, the army moved into Anatolia where it was destroyed by Turkish forces. A second substantially larger force under the command of French nobility arrived in Constantinople. This force moved through Anatolia and experienced a large degree of success in fighting the Turks, capturing Antioch in 1098 and taking Jerusalem in 1099, massacring many of the city's inhabitants, Muslims, Jews, and Christians alike. The third wave of European forces joined them in the conquered city in 1101.


The final result of the first crusade was the establishment of the Crusader States of the Kingdoms of Jerusalem and Antioch and the Counties of Tripoli and Edessa.

Why do you think William Blake never actually says the word "London" in the poem itself? Could this poem be about other cities?

William Blake probably doesn't ever say the word "London" in his poem because he does not need to name the city by name.  There is little doubt that the city is London based on the opening stanza.  



I wander thro' each charter'd street,


Near where the charter'd Thames does flow.



The direct naming of the Thames river clearly identifies the city as London, so there is no need to use the word "London."  



In regards to the second part of your question, "Could this poem be about other cities," yes I think the poem could be describing just about any other sprawling metropolis during this time period.  The poem describes the city as being crowded, dirty, depressing, and dangerous.  I've read enough about the industrial revolution to know that Blake's description of city life is not unique to London.  The poem could be about Boston or New York during that time, and his descriptions wouldn't change (other than the Thames river part).  

What does Annie teach other family members in The Miracle Worker?

When Annie arrives at the Keller's home, she discovers that no one has ever tried to discipline Helen. The entire family has let Helen have her way in order to avoid her ferocious tantrums, which include throwing objects and hitting people.


Annie teaches the family to stop pitying Helen. Instead wants them to help her learn as much as she possibly can. But this is difficult for everyone. They don't like to see Helen upset, and Annie's methods require disciplining Helen. 


Annie finally gets the reluctant family to allow her two weeks alone with Helen. Despite the amazing progress she makes with Helen, the family starts to allow her to revert back to her poor behavior.


Soon enough Annie is able to show the family the value of being firm with Helen and how that actually helps her learn and enjoy life more. Essentially she teaches them how to truly love Helen instead of indulging her.

What is a memorable line/quote from chapters 7 and 8 of To Kill a Mockingbird?

In Chapter 7 and 8, Jem comes to understand Boo Radley but Scout is still wary of him.


One of the most memorable events from this chapter is the finding of the soap dolls.  Scout and Jem have been getting friendly with Boo Radley, but from a distance.  Boo leaves the soap dolls in the tree’s knothole for them to find.



I pulled out two small images carved in soap. One was the figure of a boy, the other wore a crude dress. Before I remembered that there was no such thing as hoo-dooing, I shrieked and threw them down. (Ch. 7)



Scout is still uncertain about Boo Radley.  As this chapter demonstrates, Jem is growing up and Scout is still in childhood.  Scout is afraid that the soap dolls are voodoo dolls at first.  However, the presence of the dolls is very touching.  It shows that Boo has been watching them and cares about them.


The children want to leave a thank you note in the hole, but when they go back to it someone has filled it with cement.  Nathan Radley is trying to prevent Boo from having further communication with the children.


When Scout finds a blanket on her shoulders during Miss Maudie’s fire, and doesn’t remember who put it there, Jem realizes that Boo Radley put the blanket there.  He gets upset, because he is afraid Atticus will report it to Nathan Radley and Boo will get in trouble.



“…Mr. Nathan put cement in that tree, Atticus, an‘ he did it to stop us findin’ things—he’s crazy, I reckon, like they say, but Atticus, I swear to God he ain’t ever harmed us, he ain’t ever hurt us…” (Ch. 8)



This quote demonstrates that Boo Radley is indeed a benevolent force.  It also shows that Jem is more mature than Scout.  Scout is afraid when she realizes that Boo put the blanket there.  There is plenty of evidence that Boo is a friend, but it takes Scout longer to connect the dots than Jem.

Wednesday, January 20, 2016

In Othello, to what extent is Desdemona the embodiment of power in the scene where she declares her love for Othello when asked by her father and...

This scene is an important one for Desdemona because it contrasts with her later disempowerment. Her declarations of love for Othello demonstrate their affection for one another and their equality before their relationship deteriorates until it is irreparable.


Othello suggests Desdemona—not him and not her father—speak for herself. He wants her to have her own voice. Desdemona expresses herself respectfully but clearly. She tells her father, Brabantio, “I am hitherto your daughter,” but that her allegiance is ultimately with “the Moor my lord.”


In front of officers, senators, the duke, and her angry and racist father, Desdemona says that she is bound to the Moor. She is just a young woman, but she is opposing society and Brabantio. Unless Desdemona is being sarcastic, she even seems to wish to keep a good relationship with her father, stating that she would not want “To put my father in impatient thoughts / By being in his eye.” Brabantio says goodbye to his child by warning Othello to distrust his deceitful daughter.


Othello and Desdemona are so in tune that they both want her to join him on his escapade to Cyprus, another courageous step for Desdemona to take. Even though she says relatively little in this scene and expresses submission to both Othello and Brabantio, Desdemona expresses extreme strength by risking everything to follow her desires. Even more impressive, she stands by it.

At the beginning of Act I, what behavior of Nora's does Torvald express concern about?

Torvald gives Nora many nicknames, most noticeably in the first act of the play. "Spendthrift" and "Miss Sweet-Tooth" are both so-called terms of endearment that Torvald uses to address Nora; however, these nicknames are extremely revealing. 


One of the first things Nora does in the play is to ask Torvald for money, as much as he can spare her. While the audience later learns that Nora is scrimping every penny she can in order to pay off her debt, initially it seems as though she is ridiculously shallow. Torvald is of a similar impression and treats her as though she is a child begging for a new toy. His nicknames for her are as immature as he believes her to be. 


"It’s a sweet little spendthrift, but she uses up a deal of money. One would hardly believe how expensive such little persons are!" 


This is a line of Torvald's from early on in Act I and it is just one of many occasions where he playfully chides Nora for her supposed greediness. Shortly after, he accuses Nora of buying and eating sweets while she was shopping and continues to insult her intelligence with more ridiculous nicknames. He appears to heavily disapprove of her eating anything unhealthy without his permission, yet again proving that he thinks of her as a child rather than his wife.

`y = e^(-x^2), y = 0, x = 0, x = 1` Use the method of cylindrical shells to find the volume generated by rotating the region bounded by the...

The shell has the radius x, the cricumference is `2pi*x` and the height is `e^(-x^2)` , hence, the volume can be evaluated, using the method of cylindrical shells, such that:


`V = 2pi*int_0^1 x*e^(-x^2) dx`


You need to use substitution method to solve the integral, such that:


`-x^2 = u => -2xdx = du => xdx = -(du)/2`


`V = 2pi*int_(u_1)^(u^2) e^u*(-du)/2`


`V = -pi*e^u|_(u_1)^(u^2)`


`V = -pi*e^(-x^2)|_0^1`


`V = -pi*(e^(-1^2) - e^(-0^2))`


`V = -pi*(1/e - e) => V = pi*(e - 1/e)`


`V = ((e^2-1)*pi)/e`


Hence, evaluating the volume, using the method of cylindrical shells, yields `V = ((e^2-1)*pi)/e.`

How would a student write an essay reflecting on both the ending and entirety of a book? The essay should also include a reflection on the writing...

A reflective essay involves a personal reaction that contains some objective judgments, along with pyschological and emotional reaction; in other words, you explain what you came away with after reading the book. In fact, although the reflective essay is written in first person, it is not unlike a book review, so you may wish to read some reviews on the book that you have read, as well as some others.  (Here is a link to one book review:                             


http://www.nytimes.com/2006/03/27/books/27masl.html?_r=0 )


Is there any significance to this title? (What is the meaning and importance of this title?)
Does it arouse your interest? 
Does it seem appropriate to the literary work? (Does it fit?)


  • Reflection on the ending- Ask yourself:

Am I satisfied with the ending? Did it fit with the narrative, or was it abrupt and disconnected? or "flat"? (Always provide reasons for your answers.)
Did it match the tone of the rest of the narrative, or did it seem to belong to another book?
Did the character(s) act as you expected?
Did the ending leave you with questions still? Was it a satisfying ending? Why?


  • Writing Style

What kind of style is used--Is it rather formal and distant, or does the author seem to be talking to you? Is too much dialogue, or not enough? What form of narration is used (i.e. first person narrator, third person, or omniscient narration)? Are the main characters developed well enough? How are the sentences written? (For instance, some writers like F. Scott Fitzgerald have a lyrical quality to their writing.)


It the narrative romantic, realistic, naturalistic, magical realism, etc. [Look these terms up in a literary glossary]. What effect does this type of narrative have on the book in general? (e.g. The Call of the Wild is naturalistic; in this novel, the animals and people act on their instincts and basic nature) Does the reader learn much about the main characters? If so, what? (Don't write about the characters; write about how the characters are developed, and what connection they have to the theme. Are they realistic, or more composites of certain qualities?) 


In the end, pronounce your judgment on the book. Was it satisfying? Worth reading? Entertaining? Comforting? Enlightening?
____________________________________________________________


After jotting down your responses, put them together in a coherent essay. Find three key points and write a thesis. Here is an example:



(Title of novel) is an intriguing work because while the main character seems _______________there are interesting developments to the plot which affect the reader, leaving her/him wondering/satisfied/curious, etc. ______until an ending that _________


Tuesday, January 19, 2016

3(X+y)=y if (X,y) is a solution to the equation above and y is not equal to 0 what is the ratio x/y ? I don't understand this question and would...

Hello!


It is not hard. As you know, usually to find two unknowns two equations are required. There are only one equation, so probably we cannot find `x` and `y` separately. But the question is not about finding `x` and `y` but `x/y` only.


First, open the parentheses using the distributive law:


`3(x+y)=3x+3y=y.`


Then, move all terms with `x` to the left and all with `y` to the right (actually, add `-3y` to both sides):


`3x=y-3y=-2y`



(`y-3y=1y-3y=(1-3)y=-2y` by the distributive law also).



Now divide both sides of `3x=-2y`  by `y` and then by `2` and obtain


`x/y=-2/3.`


This is the ratio in question, -2/3.

Who was responsible for the coming of the Civil War? Were strong personalities important? Could the war have been prevented?

The American Civil War was one of the bloodiest conflicts in national history, with the total number of casualties estimated at around 620,000 soldiers.  In this war, the northern states (also known as the Union) faced off against their southern neighbors, who had just recently seceded and formed the Confederate States of America.  When it comes to placing blame for the genesis of this war, though, neither the North or the South was fully at fault, for the Civil War arose, and some scholars would argue its inevitability, due to tensions surrounding the two sides' vastly differing economies and ideologies.


The northern economy prior to the Civil War was largely an industrial one, with factories and mills in cities such as Boston, New York, and Philadelphia.  This was due in part to the greater availability of natural resources (i.e. coal) within the region.  Additionally, the mileage of railroad track in the North was far greater than that of the South, enabling faster shipment of raw materials and finished goods.


The economy of the South, by contrast, was mostly based in agriculture, with the warm climate and fertile soil of the region enabling establishment of large-scale farms (often known as plantations) and the growth of profitable cash crops such as tobacco and cotton.  As a result, southerners saw very little need for industrialization, with fewer miles of railroad track than in the North and only ten percent of the population residing in urban communities.  Furthermore, while not all southern farmers owned slaves, this "peculiar institution" was seen as an inseparable component of the agricultural economy.


Another key difference between the northern and southern regions of the United States was that existing in their respective ideologies.  The southern way of life was deeply rooted in the concept of Jeffersonian agrarianism, which valued the virtue of "plain folk" over the more elite (and possibly corrupt) city populations, and held that an individual only needed to remain in one place and work on a farm.  By contrast, the North espoused the Whig ideology, one which valued modernization and the idea of a person "pulling themselves up by their bootstraps" and relying on their own abilities to overcome boundaries of self and location.


Some major personalities central to the Civil War's eventual breakout included Henry Clay, John C. Calhoun, Stephen Douglas, and Abraham Lincoln. 


Henry Clay, a member of the Whig Party, helped to engineer the Compromise of 1850, a series of bills passed to defuse political and sectional conflicts between free and slave states over the status of newly-acquired territories.


John C. Calhoun was a South Carolina senator who strongly supported slavery, and whose views on states' rights (powers exclusive to state governments), limited federal government, the opposition to high tariffs (allowing for free trade between nations), and nulllification (the right of states to declare federal laws null and void) influenced the South's decision to secede.


Stephen Douglas was a Northern Democratic senator from Illinois who assisted Clay with the Compromise of 1850, and is perhaps best known for his support of popular sovereignty, or the idea that states should be given the right to decide whether to allow or prohibit slavery.


Abraham Lincoln was an Illinois politician and lawyer, as well as the 16th President of the United States.  While his policies and actions as President helped to preserve the Union, his belief prior to and during the Civil War was that slavery could only be abolished as the result of constitutional amendments or military tactics (the Emancipation Proclamation being seen as an example of the latter).


In conclusion, the American Civil War was the result of major sectional, political, and ideological conflicts between the industrial North and the agrarian South, and the tensions which emerged from them became too great to be resolved politically or peacefully.

Monday, January 18, 2016

What role do the minor characters play in the novel Of Mice and Men?

The majority of the minor characters in Of Mice and Men play rather large roles in the story. Characters such as Curley's wife and Carlson are instrumental in moving the story along and demonstrating the beliefs of the particular time. 


Curley's wife is a good example of how women were viewed during the Great Depression era. It was a difficult time period, as both jobs and money were scarce. Curley's wife has dreams too, dreams that she shares about making it big, going to Hollywood, and starring in the movies. We never do learn her name though, despite the fact that her death drives George's decision to euthanize Lennie. Women fall into two categories in this text: "good" and "bad". We're really not given any examples of women who fall into the "good" category, with the possible exception of the girl whose dress is torn by Lennie in Weed. Despite her minor character status, Curley's wife is an instrumental and integral piece in understanding the thought processes of the main characters. 


Carlson is another minor character that is essential to understanding the text. He represents an "every man" type of character. He's the classic migrant worker, not too much of a thinker, not necessarily mean spirited, but definitely self-involved. Who isn't self-involved these days? It's the Great Depression and you've got to look after yourself. No one else will look out for you. Unless, of course, you're Lennie and George. That's part of what sets them apart. They've got each other. It's also what further illustrates the sadness of what George has to do in euthanizing Lennie at the end of the text. Carlson's thoughtlessness and lack of tact is demonstrated with how he behaves in the euthanization of Candy's dog and again at the end of the text in his behavior with George. 

How does knowing about social welfare make you a better citizen?

In general, knowing about government policy will make you a better citizen by allowing you to make better informed decisions about how to vote. Knowing policy, and having informed opinions about it, will enable you to take agency over what direction you think your city, county, state or country should go. You can exercise this political agency by voting, protesting, sending letters to a newspaper, or writing letters to elected officials.


In particular, social welfare policy is incredibly important to be informed about for at least two reasons—first, social welfare policy affects millions of Americans who take part in programs like Medicare, Medicaid, Unemployment Benefits, Food Stamps, Veteran’s Affairs Benefits and Jobs, Social Security, Pell Grants, and Public Housing. Second, these programs represent a huge portion of government spending--in 2013, Social Security and Medicare alone were 37% of federal expenditures.


By understanding both the benefits and the costs of social welfare policy, you can become an informed citizen of the country, and take part in incredibly important decisions about the direction of the nation.

On the left is a typical graph for the survivorship curve of a Kemp’s Ridley Sea Turtle, and on the right is what it might look like for the...

Of all the species of sea turtles affected by the Gulf oil spill, the Kemp's Ridley sea turtle stood to be impacted the most.  It was the most endangered species in the world, and adding an oil spill to it's habitat did nothing to better it's chances for survival.  For the graph on the right, the curve for the "Before the spill" category should probably reflect the graph on the right, with a high starting point for hatchlings, then reflecting a sharp downward curve, as few turtles make it from being hatched to adulthood.  The graph for the "After the spill" category should have a lower starting point, as the number of hatchlings will likely decrease.  The number of hatchlings encountering oil on beaches and in surface waters will also increase the death count.  So the curve would start lower and have a sharper drop as age on the x-axis progressed.  The resource I have attached points out a five-fold increase, specifically on the Kemp's Ridley sea turtles, on reported beach strandings.  This is what one would expect to see in terms of impact of an oil spill on the environment.

Sunday, January 17, 2016

What are some powers denied to the national government? What are some powers denied to the state? What are powers denied to National government...

Since you have asked three questions in your post, I will answer the first two by combining them together. I will explain what some of the powers are for each level of government.


When the Constitution was written, there were some powers given to the federal government that only the federal government can have. There are also powers given to the state governments that only the state governments can have. The powers set aside only for the federal government are called the enumerated powers. The powers given only to the state governments are called the reserved powers.


Enumerated powers belong to the federal government. The federal government is responsible for making treaties with other countries. The federal government would negotiate a peace treaty ending a war. The federal government would make a trade agreement for all of the states. The federal government is responsible for printing money. The federal government makes the currency we have. The federal government is also responsible for regulating interstate and foreign trade. These are some of the powers only the federal government can have.


There are powers reserved only for the state governments. One reserved power is to make decisions regarding educational policy within a state. For example, the state government will determine how many school days there should be in a year. The state government also will make decisions for punishments for crimes committed within the state. The state government also makes decisions regarding trade within a state. It should be noted that no state law could go against a federal law.

In "Charles," why did Laurie create Charles?

Laurie is the kindergarten-age child in Shirley Jackson's short story "Charles." The reader discovers early on in the story that Laurie has serious behavior problems. He speaks "insolently" to his father, terrorizes his baby sister, and swears. The mother, who remembers a "sweet-voiced nursery-school tot," is apparently in denial about her son's conduct as he moves to school age.  


After his first day at school, Laurie comes home with stories of Charles, a boy in his class who gets "fresh" with the teacher, yells in class, and receives daily spankings. This story is set in the late 1940's, so corporal punishment was still allowed in public schools. It shouldn't be a surprise to the reader at the end that there is no Charles. He has been made up by Laurie to cover up his own behavior, which isn't much different at home.


Charles has learned he can manipulate both his parents and his own identity. He is literally creating a new persona. Some days Charles is "bad" and some days he is the teacher's helper. He is continually testing both his parents and his teachers in his struggle to shape his personality.


For a good discussion on gender roles, which may also explain Laurie's behavior, see the link below to themes in this story. The second entry is excellent in deconstructing this seemingly simple story.

Friday, January 15, 2016

Why did Rudyard Kipling title his poem "If"?

The poem “If,” by Rudyard Kipling, derives its name first and foremost from the repetitive use of the word to begin most of the lines of the poem. The poem takes the form of a conditional statement: if A, then B. The poem is a commentary on the behaviors and attitudes that Kipling believes lead to flourishing and, as he says in the last line, becoming “a man.”


Of course the intent at the time was to emphasize the importance of having integrity and strength of character, and although Kipling associated these things with manhood in the poem, they are fully applicable to any person regardless of gender. 


Some of the characteristics Kipling addresses in the poem include honesty, patience, endurance, and an inner peace that he believes lead to a life well lived.  If you foster these character traits in yourself, then your happiness will not be dependent on your external circumstances.

How did nationalism change the Italian and German states?

Nationalism basically created the Italian and Germany states in the nineteenth century. Both were a patchwork of principalities and independent kingdoms prior to the mid-nineteenth century. The early nineteenth century, however, saw the rise of romantic nationalist movements, largely led by young intellectuals. They argued that German and Italian "nations," characterized by shared histories, cultures, and languages existed, and that the boundaries of the state ought to reflect these realities. One especially influential leader in Italy was Giuseppe Mazzini, whose "Young Italy" movement helped to build momentum for the creation of an Italian nation. Nationalism was a key cause of the revolutions of 1848, and though these revolutions did not end with the unification of either Germany or Italy, they helped keep these movements going. Both of these nations were unified through a process of statecraft and wars (both foreign and civil), but the leaders of the unification process, including political elites like Count Cavour and Otto von Bismarck, were motivated in no small part by a desire to harness the powerful popular forces of nationalism for their own purposes. 

Give a description of Gulliver's encounter with the Yahoos.

Gulliver makes the mistake of hiring pirates to man his ship on his fourth voyage, and once at sea they mutiny and leave him on an island, the land of the Houyhnhnms. It is here that Gulliver encounters the Yahoos. Gulliver takes the Yahoos to be some type of animal and offers a description.



"Their heads and breasts were covered with thick hair... but the rest of the bodies were bare... They had no tails and often stood on their hind feet..."



Gulliver also describes them as deformed and highly disagreeable. The Yahoos are noisy, smelly, dirty, and unbathed. They eat almost anything, but love eating garbage.


Upon meeting Gulliver, the Yahoos climb into the trees and begin defecating on him. The attack comes to an end when one of the Houyhnhnms arrives. His time with the horses is spent trying to attain the level of perfection they embody, while the horses themselves are interested in how Gulliver could be so much like the Yahoos yet still a rational being.

Why are the characters in The Road traveling south?

The Road is set in a post-apocalyptic future. The desolate landscape and the absence of growing things, as well as the cold weather, suggest nuclear winter, i.e. the aftermath of a nuclear war. The man suggests to his son that they should travel south as it may be warmer there. They travel for days, weeks, focused on little beyond survival: they carry their few belongings in a cart and forage for food and water, hoping they will find a warmer place to be.


The image of warmth is not just a practical concern but a metaphor: warmth conveys comfort, safety, and camaraderie. These three things are sorely lacking in this world, where the few people who remain are predators, cannibals, or worse. The world was "warm" before nuclear winter arrived: with the cold came desperation and bloodthirsty behavior. The idea of a warm place contains the suggestion that the man and his son might find a place where people show kindness and compassion, instead of cruelty and brutality.

Why shouldn't Juliet marry Paris in Romeo and Juliet?

In Shakespeare's timeless classic "Romeo and Juliet," the tradition of marrying for wealth and royalty is highlighted. Juliet is a young (13-year-old) girl who comes from a wealthy, royal line of Capulets. Paris is an older gentleman with ties to the Prince and wealth and royalty of his own. He asks Juliet's father for his daughter's hand in marriage, but Capulet encourages him to let her alone for  awhile, stating his fear that she may be ruined the way her mother was by marrying young, "And too soon marred are those so early made," (Act I, scene ii, line 13).


Juliet explains to her mother that she has no wish to marry yet, "It is an honor that I dream not of," (Act I, scene iv, line 66), when asked how she feels about getting married. However, that all changes once she meets Romeo. The love Romeo and Juliet feel for one another is fast and furious, and it clouds out any possibility of either of them marrying another.


As the play continues, Romeo is banished from Verona (ironically, on the day he is married to Juliet), which creates many problems for the young lovers. However, the worst problem it brings about for Juliet is that her father is now willing to give his only daughter to Paris, even though he recently told him he thought she is too young for marriage. "A Thursday let it be-- a Thursday, tell her/She shall be married to this noble earl," (Act III, scene v. lines 20-21). This news is woefully upsetting for Juliet, and drama ensues.


Her parents threaten to disown her if she does not comply with their wish for her to wed Paris, and even her faithful confidante and friend, Nurse, agrees that it's the best course of action, "I think it best you marry with the County" (Act II, scene v., line 219), effectively severing the ties of their relationship. Juliet wholeheartedly disagrees with the adults in her life, and finds a way out of the situation. Unfortunately, her "solution" ends in untimely death for the two teenagers.


All considered, it would be a bad idea for Juliet to marry Paris. She's in love with Romeo; she has given herself to him physically and emotionally. If she were to marry Paris (which she couldn't rightly do in the Catholic church anyway), she'd be expected to consummate the rite with him, which is a sickening proposition when you consider their ages. Furthermore, marrying Paris would only further her father's belief that he has the right to control his daughter and her choices, and if she were ever able to reunite with Romeo again, her marriage to Paris would certainly create a roadblock.  

Wednesday, January 13, 2016

What does Atticus hope to achieve by defending Tom Robinson?

In Chapter 9, Atticus has a conversation with his brother about the upcoming trial. During the conversation, Jack asks Atticus how he thinks the trial will go, and Atticus responds by telling him that it couldn't be any worse. Atticus then tells Jack that before the trial is over, he hopes to "jar the jury a bit" (55). Atticus says he couldn't face his children if he didn't defend Tom to the best of his ability. Aside from exposing the truth to the prejudiced community of Maycomb, Atticus hopes his children will learn from his defense of Tom Robinson. Atticus wishes to be a positive role model for his children and influence them by defending an innocent black man in front of a racist jury. Atticus also hopes the community will feel ashamed for convicting an innocent, crippled black man and gradually make steps toward a more equal and just society.

When does The Road to Memphis occur?

The Road to Memphis is the fourth installment of a historical fiction series written by author Mildred D. Taylor. While the previous books are set during the Great Depression, The Road to Memphis takes place in 1941, as the United States is emerging from its economic crisis and into the Second World War. Similarly, main character Cassie Logan is beginning to emerge into adulthood. Cassie feels inspired for her own future and wants to get an education, but begins to feel romantic attraction towards men, which might bring the prospect of choosing motherhood over a career.


Cassie and her family face the struggle of being Black Americans in the segregated South. They are targets for harassment and violence. The theme of race relations and the oppression of Black Americans is continuous throughout all the books of this series.

Monday, January 11, 2016

What are the similarities and differences between Brutus and Caesar?

In Shakespeare's Julius Caesar, Marcus Brutus and Julius Caesar probably have more differences than similarities. While both men are respected leaders, wield political clout, and enjoy the admiration of the common plebeians, their similarities end there. Caesar is portrayed as an arrogantly ambitious man whose pride and desire for power lead to his demise. Brutus, on the other hand, is an idealistic character who cares more for preserving the Senate and political freedom than he does for enhancing his own power or status. Thus, while some similarities between the two men exist, its safe to say that they have more differences. More specifically, it's possible to assume that, overall, Brutus is a more selfless character, as Caesar is generally obsessed with his own selfish attempt to rule Rome.   


If you're writing an essay comparing the two figures, a good starting place (or "hook," if you're talking about an introductory attention getter) would be simple: just begin by generally comparing the two men, highlighting both their similarities and their differences, and then finish by introducing your thesis statement regarding this comparison. Both Brutus and Caesar are fascinating in their own right, so there's plenty of available content for anyone writing a comparative essay about the two characters. 

Saturday, January 9, 2016

What are ten words that describe Peeta from The Hunger Games?

Here are 10 words you could use to describe Peeta from Suzanne Collins' The Hunger Games: 

1) Kind 
- Peeta is a gentleman; when he and Katniss are outside together before the Games begin, he sees that she's cold and shivering so he wraps her up in his jacket knowing full well that they'll be pitted against each other in just a few days (83)

2) Resilient 
- Peeta is resilient both emotionally and physically; not only does he have to put on a brave face while in the arena, he also ends up near death and without a leg yet he's still able to come out as a victor (362)

3) Altruistic 
- Peeta is shows altruism when he gets reprimanded for burning some bread while working in his mother's bakery; however, he did this purposely so that he could give it to Katniss (31, 32) 

4) Creative
- Peeta uses his cake-decorating skills to camouflage himself once the Games begin (248)

5) Emotional
- Throughout the novel, it becomes clear that Peeta is all over the emotional spectrum; generally, he's kind, compassionate, and thoughtful but when Katniss lets it slip that some of the intimacy they shared was just "for show," he's very quick to anger and grows extremely cold (365)
 
6) Self-Critical
- While Peeta is quick to praise Katniss' skills; he's very critical of his own and doesn't feel like he'll be able to survive the arena (89)
 
7) Likable 
- During his first interview with Caesar Flickerman, Peeta acts very naturally; he smiles, tells jokes, plays up the fact that he's the son of a baker, and wins the audience over by telling them that he's in love with Katniss (130)
 
8) Thoughtful 
- Even as he's close to dying, Peeta still finds it in himself to worry about Katniss (259)

9) Self-Sacrificing
- When Peeta and Katniss are the last tributes standing, he begs her to kill him so that she can be declared winner and return to her family in District 12 (338)
 
10) Intelligent 
- Peeta is smart; once the Games start, he forms a fake alliance with the Careers in order to A) insure his safety and B) divert them from finding Katniss (162) 

Thursday, January 7, 2016

What was a hard decision the Little Prince had to make?

The Little Prince makes the difficult decision to travel from his asteroid planet, because it means leaving behind his beloved rose. He departs the tiny planet because he feels he needs to broaden his horizons, but also because he can't bear to be with the rose anymore, even though he loves her. He wants to escape how demanding she is. It is also difficult for him to understand her. He feels he always has to protect her and put her under her dome, and yet she often makes cutting remarks to him: he doesn't understand that this is her way to show she loves him. He has to go away to gain perspective and understand why the rose matters. Because of this difficult decision to leave he learns how important his asteroid is, when before he thought it was trivial.


Another hard decision the Little Prince makes is to let the snake bite him so he can go back to the asteroid. His body is too heavy to make the trip back, so he has to get rid of it. The Little Prince himself calls this act "difficult" and says it will look as if he is dead, but notes that the "important thing is what can't be seen." 

Explain the following statement about the lawyer from the short story "The Bet" by Anton Chekhov: "His reading suggested a man swimming in the...

The comparison of the lawyer’s reading during his rigorous solitary confinement to the act of swimming in the sea following a shipwreck sounds quite apt.


By accepting to live in solitary confinement for fifteen continuous years, the lawyer has staked the most vital period of his life. If he succumbs, he might ruin himself. His situation has been appropriately compared to that of a man, who is swimming desperately in the sea after his ship is destroyed.


The man constantly clutches "first at one spar and then at another" in order to drift ashore. Similarly, the lawyer finishes reading book after book during his imprisonment.


To the lawyer, it is only reading that could help him pass the long period of time that appears unending as a sea.


What he reads range from “novels with a complicated love plot, sensational and fantastic stories” and classics to languages, philosophy, and history; from Gospel and “histories of religion” to books on natural sciences, chemistry and medicine.


Thus, he reads everything that he could think of. The books provide him with the support and moral strength he essentially needs to spend the vast span of time all alone in his isolated cell. 


So, we see that his voracious reading of books is very aptly represented in the image of a man "swimming in the sea among the wreckage of his ship, and trying to save his life by greedily clutching first at one spar and then at another."

Wednesday, January 6, 2016

How come, in Lord of the Flies, Simon's hair grew? It was said on a few websites that the boys' growing hair represents their descent into...

What a terrific question! Perhaps the growth of hair is not indicative of the descent into savagery, but rather the infiltration of savagery into the boys' minds'.  While Simon never hurt a fly, he did have "conversations" with the Lord of the Flies about the evil on the island.  From chapter 8:



Simon’s head was tilted slightly up. His eyes could not break away and the Lord of the Flies hung in space before him. “What are you doing out here all alone? Aren’t you afraid of me?” Simon shook. “There isn’t anyone to help you. Only me. And I’m the Beast.” Simon’s mouth labored, brought forth audible words. “Pig’s head on a stick.”



Simon came face to face with the savagery on the island and rejected it.  His hair grows because he recognizes the evil, but he does not allow it to overtake him.


Piggy, on the other hand, does not seek out the truth as Simon does.  While he was present for the murder of Simon, it may be that he was involved with different motivation than the rest of the boys.  Piggy was seeking the comfort of the group, which is understandable given the ways in which he was repeatedly excluded from the group.  From chapter 9:



Piggy and Ralph, under the threat of the sky, found themselves eager to take a place in this demented but partly secure society. They were glad to touch the brown backs of the fence that hemmed in the terror and made it governable.



While Ralph has a history of dabbling in acts of savagery, Piggy does not.  It would be a reasonable claim that is involvement was purely to feel oneness with the larger group.

Why does Attean's grandmother treat Matt's hand?

While it is true that Attean's grandmother despises the "white man," she decides to treat Matt's hand after he hurts it trying to free a dog from a trap. There are several factors that worked together and allowed her to come to the decision to help Matt despite her negative feelings about his people. 


The dog that Matt attempted to help out of the trap belonged to Attean. This impressed his grandmother because Matt had no obligation to help the dog when he came upon it while walking in the woods. In addition, Matt and Attean's sister, who translated for Matt when he insisted upon seeing Attean's grandmother, pleaded with her at length about the situation. They needed Matt to be able to return to the trap with help to free the dog. Lastly, it was mentioned that if the wound were not fixed, it may get worse due to poison that may be in the wound. 

Monday, January 4, 2016

The encounter between Pip and the runaway convict at the beginning of the novel and his promise to him is crucial to the plot of Great...

Pip promises everything the convict demands because he is terrified. This is what the convict demands.



“You bring me, to-morrow morning early, that file and them wittles. You bring the lot to me, at that old Battery over yonder. You do it, and you never dare to say a word or dare to make a sign concerning your having seen such a person as me, or any person sumever, and you shall be let to live. You fail, or you go from my words in any partickler, no matter how small it is, and your heart and your liver shall be tore out, roasted, and ate."                                                                                               Chapter I



In Chapter III Pip brings the convict a generous amount of food including a whole pork pie, along with brandy and a file from Joe's workshop. The convict is eventually caught and taken back to the prison ship. He disappears from Pip's life. Some years later Pip is informed by Mr. Jaggers that he has "great expectations." A benefactor, whose identity is to remain a secret, wants Pip to be trained to become a London gentleman. Pip naturally assumes that the benefactor is Miss Havisham, but he cannot question her or Mr. Jaggers, who becomes his guardian.


Then in the critical and marvelously written Chapter XXXIX, Pip, who is now a cultured gentleman, is amazed and horrified to learn that his real benefactor has been the convict he helped in Chapter III when he was a little boy. The convict, whose name is Abel Magwitch, had been transported to Australia and has come back at the risk of being hanged to see the boy he made into a gentleman.



“Yes, Pip, dear boy, I've made a gentleman on you! It's me wot has done it! I swore that time, sure as ever I earned a guinea, that guinea should go to you. I swore arterwards, sure as ever I spec'lated and got rich, you should get rich. I lived rough, that you should live smooth; I worked hard that you should be above work. What odds, dear boy? Do I tell it fur you to feel a obligation? Not a bit. I tell it, fur you to know as that there hunted dunghill dog wot you kep life in, got his head so high that he could make a gentleman—and, Pip, you're him!”



The message of Dickens' novel is that the fine ladies and gentlemen all owe their superior refinement, their luxuries and their privileges to the ignorant and exploited lower classes represented by Abel Magwitch. Pip realizes that he has become a useless fop incapable of doing anything but act the part of a gentleman. He had always assumed that Miss Havisham was paying for his education and culture in order to make his a suitable husband for Estella. This dream comes crashing down, along with the realization that he is virtually the property of a well-meaning but hopelessly ignorant and uncouth convict who has been a criminal since boyhood and who has returned to England in blatant violation of the law. Pip is now obliged to harbor Magwitch and to have him as a constant companion for the foreseeable future. As Magwitch tells him:



Look at your clothes; better ain't to be got! And your books too,” turning his eyes round the room, “mounting up, on their shelves, by hundreds! And you read 'em; don't you? I see you'd been a reading of 'em when I come in. Ha, ha, ha! You shall read 'em to me, dear boy! And if they're in foreign languages wot I don't understand, I shall be just as proud as if I did.”



So Pip's encounter with the escaped convict on the marshes in the opening chapter is to affect his entire life. He becomes Magwitch's idea of a gentleman, which is like a spoiled and haughty parasite. He cannot even feel that he deserves all the money that Magwitch has spent on his "education" because Magwitch completely misunderstood Pip's motives in helping him as he did. 



“You acted nobly, my boy,” said he. “Noble Pip! And I have never forgot it!”



Pip was not acting out of compassion and generosity. He was only doing what he had been forced to promise because he was frightened out of his wits. Magwitch had a better opinion of the little boy than he deserved, just as he has a better opinion of the gentleman he has created with all his hard work and privations than that gentleman deserves now. Pip is thoroughly ashamed of himself, and Dickens intended at least some of his readers to share that shame. If some people have too much, it can only be because others have too little.

The California legislature passed a law to make Amazon collect tax for products sold to California residents because the residents weren't paying...

The clue to the correct answer is in the question.  It says that Amazon has to collect tax on items sold to California residents.  A tax that is levied on items that are sold to people is a sales tax.


The law mentioned in this question was passed in 2012.  Before that, there had been a great deal of controversy over whether Amazon (and other online sellers) should have to collect sales taxes when they sold items to people outside of the state in which Amazon was physically located.  At first, Amazon did not have to do so.  Now, more states require this.


The only other answer that would make any sense is “excise tax.”  However, excise taxes are collected only on certain specific items.  For example, there is an excise tax on cigarettes.  Excise taxes do not apply to all items that are sold the way that sales taxes typically do.


The law that California passed was a law that requires Amazon to collect sales tax on the items it sells to people in California.

Saturday, January 2, 2016

`105^@ = 60^@ + 45^@` Find the exact values of the sine, cosine, and tangent of the angle.

You need to evaluate the sine of `105^o` , using the formula `sin(a+b) = sin a*cos b + sin b*cos a` such that:


`sin(105^o) = sin(60^o + 45^o) = sin 60^o*cos 45^o + sin 45^o*cos 60^o`


`sin(105^o) = (sqrt3)/2*(sqrt2)/2 + (sqrt2)/2*1/2`


`sin(105^o) = (sqrt2)/2*(sqrt3 + 1)/2`


You need to evaluate the cosine of `105^o` , using the formula `cos(a+b) = cos a*cos b - sin b*sin a` such that:


`cos (105^o) = cos (60^o + 45^o) = cos 60^o*cos 45^o - sin 45^o*sin 60^o`


`cos (105^o) = 1/2*(sqrt2)/2 - (sqrt2)/2*(sqrt3)/2`


`cos (105^o) = (sqrt2)/2*(1 - sqrt3)/2`


You need to evaluate the tangent of `105^o` , such that:


`tan 105^o = (sin(105^o))/(cos (105^o))`


`tan 105^o = ((sqrt2)/2*(sqrt3 + 1)/2)/((sqrt2)/2*(1 - sqrt3)/2)`


`tan 105^o = (sqrt3 + 1)/(1 - sqrt3)`


`tan 105^o = ((sqrt3 + 1)*(1 + sqrt3)/(1 - 3)`


`tan 105^o = -((sqrt3 + 1)^2)/2`


Hence, evaluating the sine, cosine and tangent of `105^o` , yields `sin(105^o) = (sqrt2)/2*(sqrt3 + 1)/2, cos (105^o) = (sqrt2)/2*(1 - sqrt3)/2, tan 105^o = -((sqrt3 + 1)^2)/2.`

Scout reflects: “Until I feared I would lose it, I never loved to read. One does not love breathing.” What comparison is Lee suggesting in...

It seemed that Scout Finch was always reading.  She had started to read at a young age.  Long before starting school, reading seemed natural to Scout.  It was simply a part of her life.  


On Scout's first day of school, however, her teacher told her to stop reading.  Miss Caroline said that Scout should no longer read with her father each night.  Instead, she wanted Scout to learn how to read the "right" way.  It was after this scene that Scout made the following statement:



Until I feared I would lose it, I never loved to read.  One does not love breathing (To Kill a Mockingbird, Chapter 2).



After Miss Caroline's new command, Scout gained a new appreciation for reading.  She realized that she valued reading.  It was important to her.  She also realized that reading was so essential to her life that it was like breathing.  She did not pay attention to it, but yet it was a necessary part of daily life.

What was the device called which Faber had given Montag in order to communicate with him?

In Part Two "The Sieve and the Sand" of the novel Fahrenheit 451, Montag travels to Faber's house trying to find meaning in th...